Responsible AI for Regulated Industries
We do not build AI for every sector. We go deep in industries where the stakes are highest, where governance is non-negotiable and errors carry real consequences.
AI That Supports Clinical and Administrative Excellence
Healthcare organizations operate in an environment where AI errors carry patient safety implications. The regulatory landscape, HIPAA, FDA guidance on AI/ML in medical devices, CMS requirements, demands that every AI deployment be traceable, explainable, and governed by clear accountability structures.
We build AI agents for healthcare organizations that automate administrative burden without removing clinical judgment from consequential decisions.
Where We Work
Key Compliance Considerations
- HIPAA privacy and security requirements for any AI touching PHI
- FDA guidance on AI/ML-based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)
- CMS reimbursement and documentation requirements
- State-level health data privacy regulations
- Clinical audit trail requirements for AI-assisted decisions
Key Compliance Considerations
- SEC guidance on algorithmic trading and AI-driven investment recommendations
- FINRA requirements for explainability in AI-assisted advisory
- BSA/AML obligations for AI-powered transaction monitoring
- CFPB requirements on fair lending and adverse action explanations
- SOX controls for AI systems affecting financial reporting
AI for Financial Services That Satisfies Regulators
Financial institutions face some of the most demanding AI governance requirements of any sector. The SEC, FINRA, OCC, CFPB, and FDIC each have specific expectations, and regulators are increasing scrutiny of algorithmic systems used in credit, investment, and compliance functions.
We build AI agents that give financial organizations efficiency gains without creating the explainability gaps that create regulatory exposure.
Where We Work
Underwriting and Claims AI With Defensible Decisions
Insurance organizations use AI to accelerate underwriting, streamline claims, and improve customer service. But AI-driven decisions in these areas carry regulatory risk, particularly around explainability, fairness, and adverse action notification requirements.
We build AI agents that speed up insurance operations while maintaining the documentation trail that state regulators and internal audit teams require.
Where We Work
Key Compliance Considerations
- NAIC model laws on algorithmic decision-making in insurance
- State insurance commissioner AI use requirements (CA, NY, CO, IL)
- Fair lending and anti-discrimination obligations in underwriting
- Adverse action notification requirements for AI-driven denials
- CCPA and state privacy law compliance for policyholder data
Key Compliance Considerations
- Bar association ethics opinions on AI use in legal practice
- Attorney-client privilege implications for AI systems with access to case data
- Model Rules on competence and supervision as applied to AI tools
- Court-specific AI disclosure requirements in federal and state venues
- Confidentiality obligations for AI vendor data handling
Legal AI That Respects Privilege and Ethics Rules
Law firms and legal departments are under pressure to adopt AI for document review, research, contract analysis, and client service. But AI in legal practice carries unique ethical risk, bar associations, courts, and clients each have distinct concerns about accuracy, confidentiality, and supervision.
We build AI agents for legal environments with the accuracy standards, privilege protections, and human oversight that legal practice requires.
Where We Work
Government and Public Sector AI With Built-in Accountability
Government agencies and public sector contractors face unique AI requirements, procurement oversight, transparency mandates, civil rights implications, and the expectation that AI-assisted decisions affecting the public can be explained and audited.
We build AI agents and governance frameworks for government environments that meet federal and state transparency expectations and support mission-driven outcomes.
Where We Work
Key Compliance Considerations
- Executive Order 13960 on Trustworthy AI in federal agencies
- OMB guidance on responsible AI governance (M-24-10)
- Civil rights implications of automated decision systems
- FISMA and FedRAMP security requirements for AI systems
- State-level automated decision transparency laws
Key Compliance Considerations
- ISO 9001 quality management implications for AI-assisted QC
- Safety-critical system requirements for AI in production environments
- Supply chain transparency and audit requirements
- OSHA implications for AI-assisted safety monitoring
- ERP system data integrity requirements when AI agents write back
Manufacturing AI That Supports Quality and Safety
Manufacturers are deploying AI across procurement, quality control, maintenance, and supply chain functions. AI errors in production environments carry operational and safety consequences, which is why governance is as important as capability in manufacturing AI programs.
We build agents that connect to existing manufacturing systems and operate within the human oversight structures that production environments require.
Where We Work
Education AI That Protects Students and Supports Faculty
Educational institutions, from K-12 to higher education, face growing pressure to use AI while protecting student data and maintaining academic integrity. FERPA, state student privacy laws, and institutional policies create a compliance environment that most AI tools are not built to navigate.
We build AI agents that automate administrative functions while keeping student data protected and keeping instructors in control of consequential academic decisions.
Where We Work
Key Compliance Considerations
- FERPA student educational records privacy requirements
- State student data privacy laws (SOPIPA and state equivalents)
- COPPA implications for K-12 AI tools with minors
- Academic integrity and AI use policy governance
- ADA accommodation requirements for AI-assisted learning tools
Key Compliance Considerations
- SOC 2 Type II requirements for AI systems handling customer data
- GDPR and CCPA obligations when AI processes end-user data
- Customer contract AI provisions and data processing agreements
- Bias and fairness requirements for AI that affects end-user outcomes
- Enterprise buyer AI vendor due diligence requirements
SaaS AI That Enterprise Buyers Can Trust
Enterprise SaaS companies are adding AI features under competitive pressure, but enterprise buyers are conducting AI due diligence before signing contracts. Buyers want to know how your AI works, who is accountable for its outputs, how customer data is protected, and how errors are handled.
We help SaaS companies build AI features with the governance documentation and accountability structures that enterprise procurement teams require.
Where We Work
Ready to Talk About AI in Your Specific Context?
Bring us your use case, your compliance constraints, and your goals. A discovery call costs you nothing and gives you a clear-eyed view of what responsible AI can do for your organization.